Should 401k Plans Offer Only Index Funds?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

 

By Robert C. Lawton, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

A number of retirement plan experts believe that 401k plan participants should only be allowed to invest in index funds. They say the additional cost that participants pay for actively managed mutual funds is not justified by better performance. Some 401k plan sponsors have agreed, offering only index funds in their fund line-ups. Is that a good idea?

Arguments For Using Only Index Funds

Less volatility

There is no question that an index-fund-only line-up will be less volatile than a line-up that includes actively managed funds. Generally, less volatile funds are better for 401k plan participants, who tend to get emotional when markets are volatile, often selling at market bottoms and buying at market tops.

Lower litigation risk

Because index funds are the lowest cost alternative for any asset class, some experts believe that 401k plan sponsors are less likely to get sued by offering them. Given that the majority of lawsuits against plan sponsors have arisen because higher-cost fund options were offered when lower-cost share classes were available, this is probably a valid argument.

In addition, some commentators believe that litigation risk is further reduced when offering an index-fund-only line-up, since this approach eliminates the risk of being sued because a fund is an extremely poor performer relative to its index.

Elimination of advisor conflicts

It would seem that offering an index-fund-only line-up would make it impossible for those advisors working for banks, brokerage firms and insurance companies (who are not fiduciaries) to recommend funds that aren’t in participants’ best interests. Since these advisors work for their employers first, and probably themselves second, client interests generally come in third place. Offering an index-fund-only line-up would make it impossible for these conflicted advisors to recommend funds that pay them high commissions or soft dollar payments.

No more poorly performing funds

Index funds will always deliver average market performance. An index-only menu would appear to forever eliminate the risk of offering a bad-performing, or below-average, investment fund.

Simplicity

Many participants have a hard time understanding the goals and objectives of some of the investment funds in their plans. They may have an easier time understanding that a mid-cap index fund mimics a mid-cap index rather than trying to distinguish between mid-cap growth, value and blended funds.

The end of fund changes

If you offer a fund line-up composed of index funds only, will you ever have to make a change to your fund line-up? Maybe not. Many plan sponsors view this as simplification of their plan administration process.

Better performance

We all have seen the data showing that passive management has beaten active for many years. There may be enough data available to conclude that for some asset classes, it is better to choose a passive or indexed approach.

Closet indexers

Unfortunately, there are too many actively managed mutual funds that chart their index way too closely and are in reality index funds charging actively managed fees. These funds (and fund managers) have given active management a bad name and are the primary reason that active management has underperformed passive management so broadly recently. Actively managed fees subtracted from index returns equals an underperforming fund.

Higher level of fiduciary compliance?

Is a plan sponsor better complying with its fiduciary responsibilities by offering an index-fund-only line-up? Because the line-up would be less volatile and lower cost compared with an actively managed fund line-up, some experts think so.

Arguments For Using Actively Managed Funds

Less than 100% of every market downturn

Index funds are guaranteed to capture 100% of every market downturn. An important feature of actively managed funds is that a good active manager can sell out of positions before capturing an entire market crash. Although not every active manager has been able to accomplish this, many have. This is the strongest argument for the use of actively managed funds.

Inefficiencies still exist

Although it will be hard for active managers to beat their index in a number of asset classes that are highly researched and followed, there still are many asset classes where inefficiencies abound (e.g., international equity). Those investment management firms that have research expertise and managerial talent in these areas can significantly outperform their indexes over a full market cycle.

Misperception of active management

I have never understood why there is the widely held belief that all active managers should outperform their fund’s index every year. First, an actively managed fund needs to be evaluated over a full market cycle, not just one or two years. Also, some active managers are very good at defending your investment against loss, but not quite as skilled at outperforming the index during a rising market. And finally, in what industry are 100% of participants top performers? Yes, there are some active managers whose approach is bottom-quartile. Don’t invest with them. Invest with top-quartile managers in every asset class if you choose active management.

Animal spirits

We live in America, where entrepreneurship and innovation are valued and rewarded. Most of our brains are not calibrated to be satisfied with average or index returns. We expect to have above-average children, above-average pay raises and above-average returns in our investment portfolios. Index investing guarantees average returns every single year. I talk with very few investors who are happy with average returns. Many feel that if they experience a year of average returns, that is not a good year.

The Winning Formula

Without question, a winning formula in building a great 401k plan investment fund menu is to combine index offerings with actively managed choices for those asset classes where inefficiencies still exist. But for some plan sponsors, an all-index-fund lineup may be the best approach.

________________

About the Author

Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS is the founder and President of Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC. Mr. Lawton is an award-winning 401(k) investment adviser with over 30 years of experience. He has consulted with many Fortune 500 companies, including: Aon Hewitt, Apple, AT&T, First Interstate Bank, Florida Power & Light, General Dynamics, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, IBM, John Deere, Mazda Motor Corporation, Northwestern Mutual, Northern Trust Company, Trek Bikes, Tribune Company, Underwriters Labs and many others. Mr. Lawton may be contacted at (414) 828-4015 or bob@lawtonrpc.com.

About Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC is a Milwaukee, Wisconsin-based independent, objective Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) providing investment advisory, fiduciary compliance, employee education, provider management and plan design services to 401(k) plan sponsors. The firm currently has contracts in place to provide consulting services on more than $400 million in plan assets. For more information, please contact Robert C. Lawton at (414) 828-4015 or bob@lawtonrpc.com or visit the firm’s website at: http://www.lawtonrpc.com. Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC is a Wisconsin Registered Investment Adviser.

Important Disclosures

This information was developed as a general guide to educate plan sponsors and is not intended as authoritative guidance, tax, legal or investment advice. Each plan has unique requirements and you should consult your attorney or tax adviser for guidance on your specific situation. In no way does Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC assure that, by using the information provided, plan sponsor will be in compliance with ERISA regulations. Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. The statements in this publication are the opinions and beliefs of the commentator expressed when the commentary was made and are not intended to represent that person’s opinions and beliefs at any other time. The commentary does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC and should not be construed as recommendations or investment advice. Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC offers no tax, legal or accounting advice, and any advice contained herein is not specific to any individual, entity or retirement plan, but rather general in nature and, therefore, should not be relied upon for specific investment situations. Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC is a Wisconsin Registered Investment Adviser and accepts clients outside of Wisconsin based upon applicable state registration regulations and the “de minimus” exception.

401k Investment Menu Best Practices

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

 
PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15

By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

How does your 401k investment menu compare to the marketplace? Do you have too many investment options or too few? Are you taking advantage of all the safe harbor options available to you? In this low return, low-interest rate environment there is a new set of best practices to use for 401k investment menu construction that includes: [Read more…]

Should Your 401k Plan Offer ESG Investment Options?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

 
PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

At the very least, your Investment Committee should have a discussion about the topic. Here’s why. [Read more…]

Help Your 401k Participants Manage Risk

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15
By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

Ameriprise recently conducted a survey of investors aged 25 to 70 with regard to their views on risk. The survey sample can be considered a good representation of almost any group of investors, including those in your 401k plan. Using the survey results, Ameriprise classified investors into four categories. Outlined below are the categories along with my thoughts on what you can do as a plan sponsor to help these 401k plan participants become better investors in your 401k plan. First, it might help to better understand risk. [Read more…]

Why You Shouldn’t Use Custom TDFs In Your 401k

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15
By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

Recently, it has become popular for large corporations to adopt customized target date fund approaches for their 401k plans. Before jumping into why this approach has never made much sense to me, it might be good to start out with a couple definitions.

What are Target Date Funds (TDFs)?

Many mutual fund families have created an integrated series of investment funds with dates in their names. The dates approximate the time period that a participant will turn age 65 and retire. These professionally managed investment funds vary their bond/stock allocation percentages as time goes by so that as a participant gets closer to age 65 his/her allocation becomes more conservative. Target date funds are generally considered to be the most appropriate investment for the vast majority of your 401k plan participants.

What are custom TDFs?

Custom TDFs use a unique set of underlying investments and/or alter the bond/stock percentages significantly for the different funds in the series. These different bond/stock allocations are based upon demographic assumptions unique to the client. The intent is to create a non-standard glide path for the target date series.

Why I don’t like custom TDFs

[Read more…]

Why TDFs Are The Best Professionally Managed 401k Investment Option

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15

By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

There has been quite a bit written recently, most negative, about target date funds (TDFs).  It is hard for me to understand why since TDFs provide 401k plan participants with: [Read more…]

Four Reasons The Feds Want Company Stock Out Of 401k Plans

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15
By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

Recently the U.S. Supreme Court announced that they will be reviewing a case – Fifth Third Bancorp v. Duddenhoeffer – about the appropriateness of offering company stock in a 401k plan. Why would the Federal Government be concerned about company stock in 401k plans? Following are some potential reasons: [Read more…]

Are There Alternatives To Using Mutual Funds In 401k Plans?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15
By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

Mutual funds are the most frequently offered investment option in 401k plans. Are there any viable mutual fund alternatives? Probably not. Here’s a rundown on the most popular mutual fund alternatives which plan sponsors sometimes consider: [Read more…]

Should 401k Plans Only Offer Index Funds?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15
By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

You may have heard that many experts believe 401k plan participants should be confined to investing in index fund only line-ups. They say that the additional cost that participants pay for actively managed mutual funds is not justified by better performance. A number of employer plan sponsors have agreed, concluding that offering an index fund only line-up is the way to go.  [Read more…]

What’s Right About Target Date Funds? A Lot!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


PSI Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15
By Robert C. Lawton, AIF, CRPS, President, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

There has been quite a bit written recently, mostly negative, about target date funds.  It is hard to understand why since they provide 401k plan participants with: [Read more…]