MMM Newsletter and Website Header 10.2.15

I hope you had a great weekend! This week one of the most divisive and painful presidential campaigns ever finally comes to an end.

LRPC’s Monday Morning Minute for this week, “Harvard Study: Political Dysfunction Threatens U.S. Economy” (presented below) comes to you courtesy of Research Magazine. As an independent, objective Registered Investment Advisory firm, Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC has access to research from many sources. Be assured that I will share enlightening, useful information with you each week. This is a short piece I believe everyone can read in less than 60 seconds.

This article on political dysfunction and how it appears to damage the U.S. economy is alarming. Maybe tomorrow’s election will bring positive change to Washington. I hope that those of you who are thinking of not voting change your minds and exercise the franchise tomorrow.

Have a wonderful week!

_______________________________

Harvard Study: Political Dysfunction Threatens U.S. Economy

 

By Janet Levaux, Editor in Chief, Research Magazine

The long U.S. election cycle and political infighting in Washington aren’t just taking a toll on voters. According to a recent Harvard survey, the divisiveness, gridlock and political dysfunction are hurting U.S. competitiveness.

“Overall, we believe that political dysfunction in America is the single most important challenge to U.S. economic progress,” three business school professors said in a report released recently.

“The U.S. economy is growing, but only slowly, and it’s leaving too many Americans behind,” Jan W. Rivkin, a professor at the Harvard Business School, said in a statement. “Economic anxiety is fueling angry, divisive political campaigns with proposals that could make the economy worse. The American political system is now threatening the American economy, and vice versa. We need a sober look at the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. economy so that leaders in government, business and other parts of society can work together on a national economic strategy for shared prosperity.”

The report authors — Rivkin, Michael Porter and Mihir A. Desai — bring together data collected by the Pew Research Center and by Harvard, which polled about 5,000 current and former Harvard MBA students, as well as 1,050 members of the general public.

Specifically, survey respondents were asked if they expected U.S. competitiveness to decline in three years — in other words, did they expect firms to become less able to compete, less able to pay well or both. An average of 50% of all poll respondents said yes. Just 30% were optimistic, expecting one or both dimensions of competitiveness to improve and neither to decline, while the remaining 20% said they expected no change from current conditions. “Of those who voiced an opinion, 65% of business leaders and 50% of the general public believe that political dysfunction is obstructing U.S. economic growth and competitiveness,” the authors explained in the report.

Among Harvard Business School graduates, most believe political dysfunction obstructs economic growth and competitiveness: 56% of Democrats, 82% Republicans, 74% of Independents and 80% of others.

In terms of future salaries, 41% of all respondents polled expect firms to be less able to pay well in three years, and just 25% expect them to be better able to do so in the next few years. Furthermore, 47% expect the typical U.S. firm to employ fewer people in three years, while just 16% anticipate more employees.

One problem facing the economy, the Harvard instructors said, is that fewer jobs are being generated by small companies: In 1978, new businesses created 14.5% of U.S. jobs vs. 8% in 2014.

“While large firms have been able to prosper, small companies are struggling, startups are lagging, and small business is no longer the leading job generator,” they explained.

Taking the research one step further, the three business professors label the U.S. political system a failure.

Once the envy of many nations, the system has become “our greatest liability,” they said. “Americans no longer trust their political leaders, and political polarization has increased dramatically. Americans are increasingly frustrated with the U.S. political system. Independents now account for 42% of Americans, a greater percentage than that of either major party.”

Trust in the federal government, the report pointed out, is now less than 20%, according to Pew data. That’s down from above 70% in 1958 and roughly 40% from 1982 to 1990.

As trust has declined, so has economic growth, which averaged 4.3% from 1950 to 1969, and is now at 2.1% for 2010-2015.

Though the research highlights negative trends, it also offers concrete steps for businesses and government to take to improve prospects for both American workers and companies.

The authors, whose work is done as part of Harvard’s U.S. Competitiveness Project, identified 19 elements that determine competitiveness.

Next, they put together an eight-point plan to do the following, which they polled alumni and others about:

  • Simplify the corporate tax code.
  • Move to a territorial tax system.
  • Ease high-skilled immigration.
  • Address problems in the global trade system.
  • Improve the logistics, communications and energy infrastructure.
  • Simplify and streamline regulation.
  • Create a sustainable federal budget.
  • Develop unconventional energy sources.

Though the Harvard research found “strong bipartisan support” of both alumni and the general public for the eight-point plan, the authors said Washington “has made very little or no progress” on the economic priorities — for more than a decade.

“The current presidential election is showing no signs of advancing a coherent plan to address these areas,” they explained in the report, which they said is most unfortunate.

“Now, more than any time in recent history, the U.S. needs a national economic strategy involving action by business, state and local governments and the federal government,” said Porter, co-chair of the U.S. Competitiveness Project, in a statement.

“To make the U.S. more competitive, it is imperative that we have a fact-based national discussion about our economy and future prosperity,” he added. “Unfortunately, the rhetoric this election year has added to the almost complete disconnect between the national discourse and the reality of what is causing our problems and what to do about them. This must change.”

____________________________

About LRPC’s Monday Morning Minute

Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC (LRPC) Monday Morning Minute is crafted to provide decision-makers with important information about the economy, investments and corporate retirement plans in a format that allows a reader to consume the information in less than 60 seconds. As an independent, objective investment adviser, LRPC has access to many sources of research and shares the best and most relevant information with its readers each week.

About Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC

Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC is a Milwaukee, Wisconsin-based independent, objective Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) providing investment advisory, fiduciary compliance, employee education, provider management and plan design services to retirement plan sponsors. The firm currently has contracts in place to provide consulting services on more than $400 million in plan assets. For more information, please contact Robert C. Lawton at (414) 828-4015 or bob@lawtonrpc.com or visit the firm’s website at http://www.lawtonrpc.com. Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC is a Wisconsin Registered Investment Adviser.

Important Disclosures

This information was developed as a general guide to educate plan sponsors and is not intended as authoritative guidance, tax, legal or investment advice. Each plan has unique requirements and you should consult your attorney or tax adviser for guidance on your specific situation. In no way does Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC assure that, by using the information provided, plan sponsor will be in compliance with ERISA regulations. Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. The statements in this publication are the opinions and beliefs of the commentator expressed when the commentary was made and are not intended to represent that person’s opinions and beliefs at any other time. The commentary does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC and should not be construed as recommendations or investment advice. Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC offers no tax, legal or accounting advice and any advice contained herein is not specific to any individual, entity or retirement plan, but rather general in nature and, therefore, should not be relied upon for specific investment situations. Lawton Retirement Plan Consultants, LLC is a Wisconsin Registered Investment Adviser and accepts clients outside of Wisconsin based upon applicable state registration regulations and the “de minimus” exception.